Read random sequence variant file HL_RandomMotifSequences_11.fasta
Timestamp 20-Oct-2021 11:17:15
Finding core edit distance of 1200 sequences against  310 models
Checked edit distance for   50 models so far, total time   0.5038 minutes
Checked edit distance for  100 models so far, total time   0.4376 minutes
Checked edit distance for  150 models so far, total time   0.7282 minutes
Checked edit distance for  200 models so far, total time   0.6604 minutes
Checked edit distance for  250 models so far, total time   0.6384 minutes
Checked edit distance for  300 models so far, total time   0.6122 minutes
Parsing 1200 sequences against  310 models
Parsed against   50 models so far, total time   5.3201 minutes
Parsed against  100 models so far, total time   3.0241 minutes
Parsed against  150 models so far, total time   2.2566 minutes
Parsed against  200 models so far, total time   1.8765 minutes
Parsed against  250 models so far, total time   1.6830 minutes
Parsed against  300 models so far, total time   1.5330 minutes

ans =

    12

UUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.20, deficit  3.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.77, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.21, deficit  1.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.51, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.55, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.46, deficit  0.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.37, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -5.00, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  87.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.29, deficit  1.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.90, deficit  0.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.87, deficit  2.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.81, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.10, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GGCGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -6.04, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAGCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.91, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
ACUGU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.28, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
AAUAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.47, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGCAA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.60, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.57, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -7.87, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.09, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUUGG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.12, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CAUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.73, deficit  1.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
AGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCCUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -5.05, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CACGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GGCUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.94, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUUAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.01, deficit  0.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
CGCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AAAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.96, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.36, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.07, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CACCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -4.99, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -4.14, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  85.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UUGUA 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.57, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -8.20, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -6.21, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCCAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -4.16, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
CAUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.22, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -6.93, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit -0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.30, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UUUAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_53987.3,  4 NTs,                 CUUAG,score      -4.02, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWS-s35                         
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.37, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GGCAAC 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.18, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUAGCG 1  Matches 15; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.17, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGGCCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -7.59, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
UGUCAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.17, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GCGAUC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.11, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CCGCUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.64, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.46, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
UCCGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.78, deficit  0.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GGACUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
GGUGCC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.85, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.57, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CUACUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
GGAUAC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -5.04, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UUGGAA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.87, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CCGUUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.16, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGUGAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.75, deficit  0.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
AAACGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -5.57, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-s35                               
GUUCAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
CUGAAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.81, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.26, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
ACAGAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.46, deficit  0.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.85, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GUUUGC 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_79299.9,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.24, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.45, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55             
CUUAAG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.46, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.93, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
CAGAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -8.17, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CCGUAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.51, deficit  0.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CAACUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_41285.1,  5 NTs,                GAACUC,score      -4.47, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-s35                               
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGGAUG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -3.94, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CAAAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -6.93, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
AUUGGU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
UGAAUA 1  Matches 35; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.67, deficit  0.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AUCGCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.20, deficit  4.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
AGGCCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -7.73, deficit  3.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUCAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -5.81, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.86, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
UUGUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -5.14, deficit  2.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.17, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UUUCAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -5.83, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.64, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
GACACC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.55, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AGAAAU 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GGGCGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -5.69, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.44, ed 99, 2 cWW                                     
GUCUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGGUCU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -3.85, deficit -0.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GAGUCC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -3.89, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_58912.1,  4 NTs,                CUGUUG,score      -4.16, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GAUUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -4.46, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-F                             
CGCAUG 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.81, deficit  2.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.92, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GUCUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUGAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.85, deficit  0.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
AUGCGU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_34974.1,  6 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55                 
GGGCCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -7.59, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAUGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.28, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGUAGAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -9.20, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CAAAUUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.26, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GGCAGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -9.75, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGUCAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_67216.4,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -6.15, deficit  2.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.62, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGUUGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.70, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
GGAAAGC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
AUCGAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -7.18, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CUGAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -6.73, deficit  2.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CGAUCUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -8.54, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAACCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.97, deficit  2.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
GAAGAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -5.53, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
GUAAACC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GGAGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.51, deficit  2.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GAAGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUACG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.69, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
CUUUCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.79, deficit  1.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGAUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -7.93, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UUUCGAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.90, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  62.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
AGCUGAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -8.13, deficit  0.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GGGACUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_14286.1,  5 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -8.80, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CGGUUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.15, deficit  1.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UAUAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.77, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GUUAUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.91, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGCAGUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.28, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AGGACGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score     -10.54, deficit  4.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.76, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGACUCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.06, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
UUUCAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -7.85, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GGACUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.58, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CGCAAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UAAAAAA 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.28, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55046.1,  5 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -6.79, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
UCCGGAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -6.34, deficit -0.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CUCCAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -7.69, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GCGAACC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.87, deficit  3.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
GAAAACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUUAAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -9.04, deficit  4.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CCAAAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.62, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CCUUUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -5.89, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGACUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.32, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UAUUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score     -10.22, deficit  7.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AUAAAUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.27, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGGUUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.43, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GUGCGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.77, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GGGUUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.05, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAUCUCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -6.64, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.67, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UAUAAUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.28, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UUUUAUA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.05, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GUUAAGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -8.95, deficit  4.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -5.16, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
CGCGAUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -8.51, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
GAAAAUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.47, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CAAAAACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.08, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
GUGAACAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -9.12, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAUUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.30, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
AUCAGUUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -12.13, deficit  5.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAUUCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -12.33, deficit  7.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUAGAUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.94, deficit  3.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGUCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_86769.2,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.53, deficit  2.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55         
UGUAAUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -8.62, deficit  2.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUGAAGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.63, deficit  4.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CUAAAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score      -8.88, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAUAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.09, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGCGAGC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.76, deficit  2.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGGAAUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score     -10.74, deficit  5.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.68, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CUAUUAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -9.16, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAUUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.89, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGGCACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.57, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
CGAUCAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -6.08, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
AGAAAGCU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -11.52, deficit  5.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
UGGCCCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.89, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUUUGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -4.59, deficit  0.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UGAAGAUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.92, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
AUAAACAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35491.2,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -7.38, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35                 
CUUUGAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_91131.1,  7 NTs,             GCUUUGGAC,score     -11.61, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUUGAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.97, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGCUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score     -10.56, deficit  4.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CUCUAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -9.42, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CCUGUAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -8.03, deficit  2.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.09, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GUUCCAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32512.6,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.30, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGAAGCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -10.59, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUCGUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06920.1,  8 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -9.91, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35                   
GGACGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score     -11.05, deficit  4.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
UAAAGAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -8.24, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
CGGAGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -9.88, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CGCAAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.96, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGUGGUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -8.43, deficit  4.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CGAUUACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
AUAACAUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -9.49, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUUUUGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
CGCACGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score     -10.98, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
GCCCGCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score     -10.52, deficit  4.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.00, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGUGACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -9.57, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
GUCCCUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -8.57, deficit  2.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGUGAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGAUCCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -7.29, deficit  0.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGCUGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -13.53, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
CUAAGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UGUUUCCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -12.01, deficit  8.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
CGUGUGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score     -10.31, deficit  4.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAUGGUUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score      -8.45, deficit  1.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CACCUUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.77, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CGAUACAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGUUCUAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -9.25, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CAAGGGUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score      -9.01, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CGAUUCACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAGAGCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -11.58, deficit  2.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
CGGCCUGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.77, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
GAGGCGUAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score      -9.69, deficit  2.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
UGGUUAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -9.18, deficit  2.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CGUCCCGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -14.10, deficit  4.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGUUCAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -6.06, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CUAAACUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.01, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGGUUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_02811.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score      -9.38, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AUCUGAUUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -9.10, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
GCGAUUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.45, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GACGAUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.53, deficit  3.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GGCUUUUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score     -11.53, deficit  7.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
CGCCGCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -7.37, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
AGAUCUAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.25, deficit  5.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CUAAAGGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score     -12.82, deficit  7.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
GUCGAAUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -12.75, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
GGUCUGCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score      -9.31, deficit  1.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUUGUCGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score     -12.58, deficit  8.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAGGUAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score     -10.26, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
AGACACGGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -10.62, deficit  5.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CGAAACAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.81, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUGAACUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -16.74, deficit 12.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGAAGAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.59, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GGUUCAGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -7.88, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCAAUCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
CGAAAUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -12.69, deficit  5.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.71, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAAAAAACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -7.14, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCAGGCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.15, deficit  5.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAGAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score      -8.44, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CGACUAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -13.27, deficit  7.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UUGGCCCUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.86, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAAGGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.75, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
UGAAGAGUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -10.28, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CUUAAGGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.30, deficit  5.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
UAAGGUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score      -9.14, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GAUUAAACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.34, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CCCUCAUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -7.93, deficit  4.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGGGAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93551.1,  8 NTs,              CAUGGACG,score      -8.77, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55               
UAGCCUUAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -11.62, deficit  4.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
CAGUAGGUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -8.79, deficit  3.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
CCGGAAAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.26, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
CGGCCAUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -11.90, deficit  8.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGGGUCGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80705.1,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -11.35, deficit  5.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55         
UUGGUGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_73051.1,  8 NTs,             GAGGAGGUC,score      -8.65, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35
AUAAAGACGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.80, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGAGUAUUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -13.05, deficit  5.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
UGAGAGGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.48, deficit  4.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAGAAGCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -12.53, deficit  4.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GCCGCAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.16, deficit  6.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
CUUGGAGUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30819.1,  8 NTs,            AUUGAGAGCU,score     -13.69, deficit  4.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55     
GUGAAAAAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GACCUGGAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.10, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.78, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUGUCCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.46, deficit  7.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCAUAAGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.89, deficit  4.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.17, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUGAUCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.81, deficit  6.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GGUUAAAUUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -9.44, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAGAUUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.67, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.82, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
AUUCGAAAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.16, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UAAAACUAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73235.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -12.67, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55                   
CUUUGGUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.35, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGACAUCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -17.39, deficit 10.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCGCGAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -11.71, deficit  5.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAUCUCCGAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -12.04, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
CGGAAGUGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.60, deficit  5.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GGAAAGGCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.93, deficit  5.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGUCUAAAAU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -11.57, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.14, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CUCGAAUUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -11.91, deficit  6.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
UGUAUGAAUA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.43, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUCAAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.02, deficit  4.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.46, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUAGAGGAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.57, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.28, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
AAAAAAGAGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -10.91, deficit  4.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.02, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UAAAAAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -12.22, deficit  4.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CAGUGGAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -8.42, deficit  0.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAUAGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.00, deficit  5.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CGGUUGGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -11.21, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAGGCCCAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -12.34, deficit  4.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
GUAAGUUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -13.24, deficit  7.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.63, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
GCAUCCGCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -10.96, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGAAAGCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -8.21, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.18, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAGAGAGGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_53499.1,  4 NTs,            CAGCUGGGAG,score     -10.94, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-F                               
UCUGUGAAUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50537.2,  8 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score     -12.23, deficit  8.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUGCAACUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -6.96, deficit  2.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CUCAAGUGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -14.33, deficit  8.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.87, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUUUAAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score     -12.96, deficit  6.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
GGAGGGCCUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.54, deficit  6.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CGAGACUACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.74, deficit  6.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUGUAAAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.71, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUGCAGAGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.27, deficit  5.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
AAGCCUCAAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -12.84, deficit  4.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
CUAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.51, deficit  3.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGGAAAGUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.26, deficit  3.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.95, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
GCAAGCAUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -11.05, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CACCGUAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -12.01, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAAAGAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -14.75, deficit  9.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
AAAGUUGCCAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -11.04, deficit  6.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.82, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
CGAACUUUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.86, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUCCUAAGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.21, deficit  3.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAUAAACAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.62, deficit  5.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUAAUGAGAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.18, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUCUUGCGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.50, deficit  4.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
ACGCCGAUAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -14.45, deficit  6.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
AAGAUAUUGCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score      -8.78, deficit  1.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GUAAGGAAGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -11.70, deficit  4.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CUAUAAAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -11.83, deficit  4.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAUUGCCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.98, deficit  7.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
UUGGGAUGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -10.81, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
GUUAAAUAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score      -9.58, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
GUAAAAAGACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -11.24, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.65, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CCGAUAUCAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CUGGAGAUGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.62, deficit  4.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUAGCUGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.68, deficit  7.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAGACCCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -15.77, deficit  7.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CAGAAACUGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.05, deficit  5.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.76, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGAAAUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -13.05, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUGAACCCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -12.65, deficit  5.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.91, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUAAAAGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.44, deficit  2.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.70, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGAACAGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -12.16, deficit  6.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
AAAGCCCUGAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score      -9.74, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.84, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
GCUGAGAGCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.11, deficit  4.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAUUGAGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.28, deficit  5.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.98, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGUGGCAAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -13.11, deficit  3.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CGAAAUAUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -10.83, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.63, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUCUCACUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.15, deficit  3.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUCGAAAGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -15.58, deficit 11.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAAGGGGCACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -10.80, deficit  3.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.92, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CUGGCACUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52853.1,  6 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -13.79, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.12, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CGACUUACCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -16.45, deficit 10.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCGCAAUGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -15.02, deficit  8.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
GCUAUGGAAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.73, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
AGACGUGAAGU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score      -9.67, deficit  2.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
GGAAAGUGGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.35, deficit  3.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGCGCCACUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.54, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAAAAAGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.71, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAUGGGUACAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -10.71, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GUUUGCACACAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -11.69, deficit  4.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
UUAAGGAUGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.23, deficit  6.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAACAGUAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.61, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAGGAAUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -14.20, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUUGAAAAAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60326.1,  9 NTs,         GUUUACCAAAAUC,score     -11.81, deficit  3.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35 
GAAAAGUGUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.71, deficit  7.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAUAUAACUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.12, deficit  6.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CGAGGAAGAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.24, deficit  4.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.33, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUUAAAAAUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -11.27, deficit  5.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.74, ed 99, 5 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGUUGCGACUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.75, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAUGAUGGCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -11.78, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.56, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
GUUUGCAAAGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -15.94, deficit  9.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.12, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UUAAUUAACAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.22, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CUUUGUGCUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.69, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.67, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CUUCGGAUGUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -15.06, deficit  6.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.24, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCUGCUCCUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -15.48, deficit  8.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUCUGUCCGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.66, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.65, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
CGAUCACGAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -10.96, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
AUCCGGGAGAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -15.90, deficit  8.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
CGCCAAAACGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -17.77, deficit 10.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
GUUAAGAGAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -15.51, deficit  9.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
UCGUGUUAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.56, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.15, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GUAGCCAGGUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_10751.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -15.48, deficit  9.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33                   
CUCCCAAAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -16.53, deficit  9.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CGAUAUAAAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -14.57, deficit  6.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUAAAUGAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -14.85, deficit  6.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GGAUGGCUAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.39, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
UUCGCGGGCGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -13.83, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.33, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
CUGAAAACAUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.39, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.48, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUGAAAGAUUAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_56677.4, 13 NTs,       CUGAACGCAUCUAAG,score     -19.82, deficit 13.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.54, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35
CUAGCGUUAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -17.83, deficit  6.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.93, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
CACUAAAACAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93221.1, 13 NTs,        GACCUAGAUCACCC,score     -16.21, deficit  6.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35 
AGAGAAGAUCAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -11.66, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.66, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCAAGAGAAAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -14.64, deficit  5.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
CGAACGACGGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.94, deficit  8.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAUCUUCUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.13, deficit  4.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.93, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
CGAUGGACUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.83, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.76, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GGAAGCAAGAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -18.51, deficit 10.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUUAGCAGAAUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -15.81, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.28, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
CCUUUGAUACUUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38011.1, 13 NTs,        GCUUAGAAGCAGCC,score     -13.36, deficit  5.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.51, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUCAUGAAUGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -14.73, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CGAGUGGGCAAUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.1, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -13.86, deficit  6.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.87, ed 99, 4 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55
GUCACCAAAAACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -14.75, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.33, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
CACGGAAGGAUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.1, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -13.68, deficit  6.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.69, ed 99, 4 cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55
UUCAUCAGGAAGAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -19.49, deficit  8.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.62, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
4	100.0000	 81.4545	 68.3636	4
5	100.0000	 90.9091	 48.9091	23
6	100.0000	 86.5455	 48.1818	60
7	 99.8182	 50.5455	 14.9091	51
8	 99.0909	 27.2727	  3.6364	46
9	 99.2727	 19.2727	  1.6364	68
10	 94.9091	  8.9091	  0.3636	41
11	 85.0909	  3.8182	  0.0000	42
12	 46.0000	  0.7273	  0.0000	23
13	 17.0909	  0.1818	  0.0000	12
14	  7.0909	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.8182	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.5455	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.3636	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.1818	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  44 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  68 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 100 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 102 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 127 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 132 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 134 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 163 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 179 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 182 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 215 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 235 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 237 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 243 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 245 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 246 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 249 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 250 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 264 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 267 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 279 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 299 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 306 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 329 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 331 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 332 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 336 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 342 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 342 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 345 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 349 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 352 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 364 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 385 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 387 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 396 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 406 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 411 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 418 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 475 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 481 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 485 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 515 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 520 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 575 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 576 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 594 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 604 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 628 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 631 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 657 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 684 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 691 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 771 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 823 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 893 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1047 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.5530%
Number of models giving false positives is 299 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     7.75
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.40
